#Roger Stone's Offenses - First, there is the nature of the offenses that Roger Stone committed. He lied to Congress repeatedly to obstruct the investigation into the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia. But his lies were not only numerous, they were obvious. He claimed to have no written communications about WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, yet he had many such communications. He claimed to have no written communications with his intermediary to WikiLeaks, yet there were hundreds of such records. He said he never discussed his conversation with his intermediary with anyone in the Trump camp, yet he did so on a number of occasions. To tell such blatant lies,and expose himself to prosecutors,raises a question as to whether he was doing so with the belief that he would not be punished for these actions and, if so, why he thought that was the case.
Second, revealed sections of the Mueller report show that the Special Counsel's obstruction investigation specifically included Trump's behavior towards Stone. The report shows there was good reason for Trump to be concerned about Stone's testimony. In written answers to the Special Counsel, Trump claimed:"I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with individuals associated with my campaign." Yet there were several witnesses who had said Trump was told of Stone's access to WikiLeaks,and at least one said he had witnessed a call between Trump and Stone on the very topic.
Shortly after submitting written answers, Trump criticized witnesses who testify about the illegal conduct of others, saying that "this flipping stuff is terrible" and noting that Stone did not flip on him and that was "very brave." Trump went on to publicly praise Stone's "guts" for not testifying against him. At the same time, Stone's public comments made clear he was aware of Trump's written answers and thus the legal risk they posed to Trump.
#In the case of Russia paying bounties to the Taliban for killing U.S. soldiers, President Trump has claimed that he was not informed about the payments, yet the briefing to him has been pinned down to February 27, 2020; however, the information had been available in 2019. Since intelligence briefings are made available to a number of high officials in the Trump administration, anyone of which could have informed Trump about this crucial information of bounties being paid.
Another excuse for Trump not taking action against Russia after he learned about the bounty payments is that since the intelligence agencies were not unanimous is their assessment of the reliability of the evidence garnered, it didn't "rise to the level of" taking action. This argument is much the same as used in the impeachment trial that Trump's "quid pro quo" with Ukraine's president didn't "rise to the level of" convicting Trump. Historians will probably indict this generation for embracing "rising to the level of" as the rationale for allowing powerful people to break the law with impunity. President Trump has broken many laws, and he has demonstrated many times that he will continue to break the campaign finance law -- John Bolton added China's leader to those leaders who have been solicited for help in Trump's reelection campaign.
#Nutritious Food in Southern Africa
45M - Number of people in southern Africa who lack sufficient access to nutritious food -- up nearly 10 percent from 2019.
8.4M - Children who are expected to suffer from acute malnutrition across southern Africa this year, some 2.3 million of them will require lifesaving treatment.
820M - Number of people worldwide who suffered from hunger in 2018 -- up from 784 million in 2015.
60% - Share of food-insecure people who are women or girls.
2B - People who are unable to access safe, nutritious and sufficient food year-round.
132M - Additional people who could become chronically hungry this year because of the Covid-19 pandemic. (Source: The Nation, August 24/31, 2002.)
ADDENDUMS:
*What the GOP lawmakers were saying in the impeachment trial is that impeachment can't be considered serious or fair without direct fact witnesses,and there can be no direct fact witnesses because President Trump contends he has every right to deny their appearance.
*The 14th Amendment specifies that representatives be apportioned "counting the whole number of persons in each State." Neither it nor the Constitution specifies that only citizens must be counted.